This is a draft charter only. It has not been endorsed by W3C Management or Members and is therefore entirely speculative.

Comments on this draft are welcome via public-ole-comment@w3.org [Archive, Subscribe].

Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group Charter (Draft)

The Web has provided the community with standardized mechanisms for numerous content-management services: publishing, distribution, consumption, describing, and sharing. However, the key area of permissions, obligations and licensing has not been addressed in Web standards to date. Content licenses, rights statements, permissions and obligations express the terms of usage for content. With a standard vocabulary, content owners can express terms and processing systems can determine what permissions and other terms are associated with a given resource or collection of resources.

A permissions and obligations expression system should provide a flexible and interoperable information model that supports transparent and innovative (re)use of digital content across all sectors and communities. The underlying model should support the business models of open, educational, government, and commercial communities through profiles that align with their specific requirements whilst retaining a common semantic layer for wider interoperability. The system should not, however, be the basis of legal compliance or enforcement mechanisms.

A permissions and obligations expression language is composed of detailed terms that are both machine-processable and expressible in a form for human-consumption. Allowable actions, constraints, and requirements are expressed at a level enabling complex and business-specific expressions to be created from a vocabulary with specific semantics. This accommodates a broad range of situations and addresses a different business/user need than systems such as Creative Commons that provide generic sharing licenses.

The mission of the Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group is to define a semantic data model for expressing permissions and obligations statements for digital content, and to define the technical elements to make it deployable across browsers and content systems.

@@@Join the Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group@@@.

End date	31 December 2017
Confidentiality	Proceedings are public
Initial Chairs	Ben Whittam Smith, Thomson Reuters Renato Iannella, Knowledgeflux, TBC
Initial Team Contacts (FTE %: 20)	Phil Archer
Usual Meeting Schedule	Teleconferences: weekly Face-to-face: twice annually

Scope

The semantic information model, vocabulary, and serializations will start from the ODRL specifications, developed by the W3C ODRL Community Group. The ODRL work began 15 years ago and has been evolving the specification to meet industry and community requirements with wide scale adoption. Over the past few years the group transformed into the W3C ODRL Community Group and has created five updated Version 2.1 specifications (an information model, vocabulary, XML encoding, JSON encoding, and ontology). The current ODRL specifications are deployed as profiles by business sectors, for example the IPTC has adopted ODRL for licensing online news articles.

The Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group will take into account additional needs of the wider community including commercial and non-commercial publishers, consumers and re-users of human readable content and machine readable data. In addition, implementation feedback from related languages and initiatives will be considered in the final deliverables. For example, ODRS and PLUS photo licensing.

In order to address the needs of atomic rights and obligations expressions, this Working Group will produce deliverables that define an abstract information model that is then realized in a variety of mappings and serializations. This work will take the form of several specifications as Recommendation Track documents and supporting Notes.

Deliverables

The titles of the deliverables are not final; the Working Group will have to decide on the final titles as well as the structures of the documents. The Working Group may also decide to merge some deliverables into one document or produce several documents that together constitute one of the deliverables.

Additional Use Cases and Requirements document (Note)
A technology-neutral permissions and obligations information model (Recommendation)
A definition of the formal semantics of the information model (Note)
A vocabulary for machine-readable expression of permissions and obligations (Recommendation)
Mapping of the model and terms in XML (Recommendation)
Mapping of the model and terms in RDF/OWL (Recommendation)
Mapping of the model and terms in JSON (Recommendation)

The working group will further consider publishing a Note describing a P & O expression of Creative Commons licenses.

Inputs

The Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group will use the following W3C ODRL Community Group specifications as the starting position:

Other similar models, languages, and terms will also be considered by the Working Group based on an analysis of additional Use Cases and Requirements that the group will collect.

Security and Privacy Considerations

Each specification should contain a section detailing any known security and privacy implications for implementers, Web authors, and end users.

Success Criteria

To advance the encoding specifications to Proposed Recommendation, evidence will be gathered of independent implementations of permissions & obligations expression systems (at least two per mapping).

Milestones (Recommendation)

Milestones (Rec Track)
Deliverable	FPWD	LCCR	PR	Rec
Note: The group will document significant changes from this initial schedule on the group home page.
Permissions & Obligations Expression - Information Model	May 2016	April 2017	October 2017	December 2017
Permissions & Obligations Expression - Vocabulary	May 2016	April 2017	October 2017	December 2017
Permissions & Obligations Expression - XML Mapping	May 2016	April 2017	October 2017	December 2017
Permissions & Obligations Expression - RDF/OWL Mapping	May 2016	April 2017	October 2017	December 2017
Permissions & Obligations Expression - JSON Mapping	May 2016	April 2017	October 2017	December 2017

Milestones (Notes)
Deliverable	FPWD	WG Note
Note: The group will document significant changes from this initial schedule on the group home page.
Permissions & Obligations Expression - Use Cases & Requirements	May 2016	November 2016
Permissions & Obligations Expression - Formal Semantics	May 2016	November 2017

Timeline View Summary

February 2016: First teleconference
March 2016: First face-to-face meeting
May 2016: First publications, expected to be minoir modifications of existing ODRL documents
April 2017: Candidate Recommendation
October 2017: Proposed Recommendation
December 2017: Recommendation

Dependencies and Liaisons

W3C Groups

Digital Publishing Interest Group: The Permissions & Obligations Expression work is highly relevant for the Publishing Community at large that this group represents within W3C
Data on the Web Best Practices and Spatial Data on the Web Working Groups.: Permissions and Obligations are highly relevant to the sharing of data on the Web.
Internationalization Activity: Licensing Statements must take account of multilingualism as well as jurisdictional differences.
Privacy Interest Group: Ensure that the privacy concerns are properly included in the WG's considerations.
Social Web WG, LDP Next CG and Web Payments IG.: Possible new use cases will be solicited from all three groups.
Semantic Web Interest Group and its Web Schemas Task Force.: Feedback on the vocabulary will be sought from the SWIG's Public Vocabs list.
The ODRL CG: Membership of the ODRL CG is wider than the WG and provides an important source of input and expertise.

Furthermore, the P&am;OE Working Group expects to follow these W3C Recommendations:

Participation

To be successful, the Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group is expected to begin with 20 or more active participants and to sustain sufficient numbers to complete the multiple deliverables. To get the most out of this work, participants should expect to devote several hours a week; for budgeting purposes, we recommend at least half a day a week. For chairs and document editors the commitment will be higher, say, 1-2 days a week. Participants who follow the work less closely should be aware that if they miss decisions through inattention, further discussion of those issues may be ruled out of order. However, most participants follow some areas of discussion more closely than others, and the time needed to stay current therefore varies from week to week. The Working Group will also allocate the necessary resources for building Test Suites for each specification.

Decision Policy

As explained in the Process Document (section 3.3), this group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a question and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal vote) and any objections, and move on.

A formal vote should allow for remote asynchronous participation—using, for example, email and/or web-based survey techniques. Any resolution taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference is to be considered provisional until 5 working days after the publication of the resolution in draft minutes sent to the group's mailing list.

This charter is written in accordance with Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C Process Document and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process Document requires.

About this Charter

This charter for the Permissions & Obligations Expression Working Group has been created according to section 5.2.2 of the Process Document. In the event of a conflict between this document or the provisions of any charter and the W3C Process, the W3C Process shall take precedence.