Related Resources

TilT Evaluation of the AC Review Results

How TiLT manages AC review results depends on the results themselves. The first three cases below require TilT discussion; the fourth only requires notification to TiLT.

Case 1: There are Unresolved Formal Objections

The charter shepherd reports the review results to TiLT for discussion and requests the start of a Council.

Case 2: There are Changes

If there are no unresolved Formal Objections but there are changes to the charter —either requested by reviewers or resulting from resolution of Formal Objections:

If the time period elapses without dissent by AC Reps and TiLT gave its approval, the charter shepherd proceeds directly to requesting announcement of the charter. Otherwise, TiLT discussion takes place. Upon subsequent approval, the charter shepherd requests announcement.

Case 3: Uncontroversial Review but TiLT Approval Required

If there are no Formal Objections and no changes, then there are still two scenarios when TiLT approval is required:

In either case, the charter shepherd reports the review results. That message should highlight that the review was uncontroversial and point out which topics now require TiLT approval. Upon subsequent approval, the charter shepherd requests announcement of the charter.

Case 4: Uncontroversial Review and No TiLT Approval Required

The charter shepherd reports the review results to TiLT and indicates that the charter is deemed approved and no further TiLT approval is required.

The charter shepherd then requests announcement of the charter.

Reporting AC Review Results to TiLT

In all of the above cases, the charter shepherd reports the review outcomes to TiLT with the following information:


Feedback is to @w3c/tilt and is welcome on GitHub