Meeting minutes
Repository: w3c/dpv
Agenda: https://
Meeting minutes: https://
Persistent ID for current minutes: https://
Representing Use-Cases
<ghurlbot> Issue 284 [NEW]: Modelling Intended Uses/Purposes as Use-Cases (by coolharsh55)
continued discussion
discussed UseCase as a concept to be added to DPV
+1 from Paul and Julio
Next week to decide on categories of use-cases
Operating Factors / Environment
<ghurlbot> Issue 285 [NEW]: Modelling Operating Factors for Technology (by coolharsh55)
discussed this, decision next week
Secondary Use
<ghurlbot> Issue 283 [NEW]: Secondary Uses for Data Reuse (by coolharsh55)
discussed compatibility as a concept in GDPR, AI Act, and EHDS
BeatrizEsteves: Should there be compatibility for purposes, we were thinking of a property to state compatibility with purpose
HarshPandit: Good idea, we should have the property isCompatibleWith and isIncompatibleWith, but these should work at the use-case or process level as the test of compatibility can involve many things
GeorgKrog: How would this compatibility be determined?
HarshPandit: compatibility is specific to the use-case or framework e.g. in GDPR we have purpose compatibility which is purposes, but also invovles data categories, recipients, legal basis, etc.
BeatrizEsteves: How would this work with policy checking?
HarshPandit: you have a test for checking compatibility, and then when comparing the two policies you check whether it is compatible or not, and these concepts are the outputs
HarshPandit: note for policies we need fixable and non-fixable compatibility so we know what can be resolved
GeorgKrog: Where in GDPR would this be useful?
HarshPandit: e.g. to model scenarios during DPIA. GDPR already has a structure for describing use-cases which is Art.30 ROPA records which gives indication of what information is present in such an use-case
AOB
GDPR revision proposed
HarshPandit: proposal from EU Commission on diluting ROPA requirements for GDPR, some specific wording of concern on special categories.
GeorgKrog: Not sure about the usefulness of these as these concepts are already required for fulfilling other obligations which are still present
PaulRyan: Agree, these are needed for rights and transparency
TCF ruling
GeorgKrog: Court ruling on IAB and TCF declaring it illegal https://
HarshPandit: congrats to Johnny and ICCL
NXDG workshop
BeatrizEsteves: CFP for NXDG workshop -- https://
New complaint
MarkLizar: complaint filed against Google Chrome https://
Next Meeting
The next meeting will be on MAY-22 Thursday 13:30WET/14:30CET
Agenda will be EHDS concepts led by Georg, and continued discussions from today on use-case categories, operating factors, and secondary use concepts