<h>
ElementJust kidding, don't use this element. It doesn't exist, but it should. TimBL thought so in 1991, and I still think it should exist, but it doesn't. As he said:
I would in fact prefer, instead of <H1>, <H2> etc for headings [those come from the AAP DTD] to have a nestable <SECTION>..</SECTION> element, and a generic <H>..</H> which at any level within the sections would produce the required level of heading.
headingoffset
attributeWhen placed on a container element, the headingoffset
attribute adjusts the aria-level of headings inside, allowing internal contents to be written independently. This is useful for helping stitch together content that is written as independent document fragments and with simple, existing authoring tools. Nested containers add levels.
<h1>I’m a level-1 heading!</h1>
<h2>I’m a level-2 heading!</h2>
<div headingoffset="1">
<h1>I’m a level-2 heading!</h1>
<h2>I’m a level-3 heading!</h2>
</div>
The practical upshot of this would give authors the ability to write content almost like Tim intended, by using headingoffset="1"
on containers, and always using <h1>
instead of his originally proposed <h>
<h1>I’m a level-1 heading!</h1>
<section headingoffset="1">
<h1>I’m a level-2 heading!</h1>
<section headingoffset="1">
<h1>I’m a level-3 heading!</h1>
</section>
</section>
</section>