RDF-star

Announcements and newcomers

<gkellogg> https://gitter.im/lotico/rdf-star

pchampin: Talk about RDF-star. Went well.
… high attendance.

<gkellogg> http://www.lotico.com/index.php/Metadata_for_RDF_Statements:_The_RDF-star_Approach

pchampin: video published via Lotico event page.

thomas: semantics issue
… need to be clear what is right and wrong use.

pchampin: Referential opacity does not preclude transparent interpretation (app can choose to use it transparently) but the reverse is not true - can't go opaque from transparent.

<TallTed> nitpick, CGs emit "reports" not necessarily "final reports"

Open actions

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/134

gkellog: we can have minority opinions.

gkellog: The URIs may change or go away. This group is "suggesting" an appraoch.
… have a time limit on URIs.

<TallTed> minting rdf:embeddedTriple would indeed be very bullying on a future WG that didn't want to include that in their amendment of rdf: ...

<TallTed> That doesn't feel like a strong argument to me.

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/136

<gkellogg> We need people to implement and report on the semantics test suite.

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/135

pchampin: Will do PRs in future for all by editorial fixes.

pchampin: Merge text - explains how to deal with blank nodes

PR https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/143

Explanation about Merge

https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-blank-nodes

pchampin: Merge vs union :: dataset default graph may be a union of named graphs.

thomas: Next week is Good Friday.

gkellog: Roadmap to "done".