W3C

RDF-star

25 March 2022

Attendees

Present
AndyS, Dominik_T, fabio, gkellogg, olaf, olaf_, ora, pchampin, TallTed
Regrets
-
Chair
pchampin
Scribe
AndyS, olaf

Meeting minutes

<fabio> hello everybody

Announcements and newcomers

pchampin: TPAC : September - Vancouver.

<gkellogg> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2022

pchampin: WG F2F meeting
… TPAC will be hybrid

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/304

advanced notice to the advisory committee will be sent soonish

pchampin: after that I will send it to the SemWeb mailing list
… expect a lot of feedback / opinions
… after some weeks, take the feedback into account and submit the charter to ??
… at this point we need the chairs
… to know who the chairs will be

Open actions

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/247 Ping Danbri about final report

pchampin: anything to report on the open action items?
… had email conversation with danbri
… he responded on a side topic (chartering)
… but has still not published our final report on the CG Web page
… now sent another email to him this morning, asking him again to click the "publish" button

ora: no progress on the AWS blog post

WG chartering

<pchampin> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues

pchampin: 2 issues: one minor (typo)
… and one about RDFa
… csarven asked to either add RDFa or remove RDF/XML
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/19

gkellogg: do we explain the choice process was for docs mentioned?

pchampin: some explanation - could say directly that it is RDF WG and SPARQL WG docs.

Action: pchampin to add an explicit rationale about the choice of documents to include (those coming from the RDF and SPARQL WG)

AndyS: concern about extra features getting added

gkellogg: Also text direction. We do have the rechartering point.

pchampin: i18n commented in the strategy review on text direction.
… possible future "living spec". Need to start WG to show it will work.

Chairs

pchampin: danbri has concerns re: multiple edges.

<fabio> I need to go. See you next time!

<TallTed> It's possible to reply to a tweet, even years later, to ask for things like starting a GitHub issue, statement of the use cases he mentioned, etc.

https://twitter.com/danbri/status/1505608948191268870

Schedule next call

Action: pchampin to add the data and time of next call on the web page

Action: pchampin see with Danbri to publish our calls on the RDF-dev calendar

<pchampin> PROPOSAL: next call in 2 weeks, 8th of April

<olaf_> +1

<pchampin> +1

<AndyS> +1

<gkellogg> +0

<TallTed> 8th, 15th, 22nd are all fine by me

<ora> +1

<Dominik_T> +1

<TallTed> +0

Resolution: next call in 2 weeks, 8th of April

Open-ended discussions

Summary of action items

  1. pchampin to add an explicit rationale about the choice of documents to include (those coming from the RDF and SPARQL WG)
  2. pchampin to add the data and time of next call on the web page
  3. pchampin see with Danbri to publish our calls on the RDF-dev calendar

Summary of resolutions

  1. next call in 2 weeks, 8th of April
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 142 (Tue Jun 1 16:59:13 2021 UTC).