This document represents the consensus of the group on the scope and features of the Vibration API. It should be noted that the group is aware of more advanced use cases that cannot be realized using this simpler first version. The intent is to address them in a future revision.
A history of changes from previous version is provided.
The API is specifically designed to address use cases that require simple tactile feedback only. Use cases requiring more fine-grained control are out of scope for this specification. This API is not meant to be used as a generic notification mechanism. Such use cases may be handled using the Notifications API [[NOTIFICATIONS]] specification. In addition, determining whether vibration is enabled is out of scope for this specification.
This specification defines conformance criteria that apply to a single product: the user agent that implements the interfaces that it contains.
Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [[!WEBIDL-1]], as this specification uses that specification and terminology.
typedef (unsigned long or sequence<unsigned long>) VibratePattern; partial interface Navigator { boolean vibrate (VibratePattern pattern); };
The vibrate()
method
steps are to run the processing vibration patterns algorithm.
A vibration pattern is represented by a
VibratePattern
object.
The rules for processing vibration patterns are as given in the following algorithm:
vibrate()
method.
visible
, then return false and terminate these steps.
To validate and normalize a vibration pattern given pattern, run these steps:
To perform vibration using a global object global and a vibration pattern pattern, run these steps:
When the user agent determines that
the [=Document/visibility state=] of
the Document
of the top-level browsing
context changes, it MUST abort the already running processing
vibration patterns algorithm, if any.
Vibration API is not a source of data on its own and as such is not producing any data possible to consume on the Web. However, it is known that it can serve as a source of events for other APIs. In particular, it is known that certain sensors such as accelerometers or gyroscopes are prone to tiny imperfections during their manufacturing. As such, they provide a fingerprinting surface that can be exploited utilizing the vibration stimuli generated via the Vibration API. In this sense, Vibration API provides an indirect privacy risk, in conjunction with other mechanisms. This can create possibly unexpected privacy risks, including cross-device tracking and communication. Additionally, a device that is vibrating might be visible to external observers and enable physical identification, and possibly tracking of the user.
For these reasons, the user agent MAY inform the user when the API is being used and provide a mechanism to disable the API (effectively no-op), on a per-origin basis or globally.
The user agent SHOULD employ global rate limiting to restrict the number of vibration requests made within a certain period (e.g., per minute or hour) to prevent excessive use.
In the following example the device will vibrate for 1000 milliseconds (ms):
// vibrate for 1000 ms navigator.vibrate(1000); // or alternatively navigator.vibrate([1000]);
In the following example the pattern will cause the device to vibrate for 50 ms, be still for 100 ms, and then vibrate for 150 ms:
navigator.vibrate([50, 100, 150]);
The following example cancels any existing vibrations:
// cancel any existing vibrations navigator.vibrate(0); // or alternatively navigator.vibrate([]);
The group is deeply indebted to Justin Lebar, Mounir Lamouri, Jonas Sicking, and the Mozilla WebAPI team for their contributions, and for providing the WebVibrator prototype as an initial input. Thanks to Anne van Kesteren for suggestions on how to make the specification reusable in other contexts, and to Lukasz Olejnik for the privacy considerations. Finally, thanks to Zhiqiang Zhang for the Simplified Chinese translation.
Changes since W3C Recommendation 18 October 2016:
Other changes that do not functionally affect interpretation of the document: