Discovery & Registration of Multimodal Modality Components: State Handling

Abstract

This document is addressed to people who want either to develop Modality Components for Multimodal Applications distributed over a local network or "in the cloud". With this goal, in a multimodal system implemented according to the Multimodal Architecture Specification , the system must discover and register its Modality Components in order to preserve the overall state of the distributed elements. In this way, Modality Components can be composed with automation mechanisms in order to adapt the Application to the state of the surrounding environment.

Status of This Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is the 11 June 2015 April 2016 W3C Working Draft on "Discovery & Registration of Multimodal Modality Components: State Handling".

Even though its first version This draft was published as a Working Group Note, modified to enhance the document status has been changed contrast in graphics to meet WCAG requirements for color contrast. Fonts in Graphics were increased in size, a Working Draft with longdesc was added and the support for keyboard interaction. We modify the
state diagram, update the expectation of progressing towards a normative Recommendation. part about states, edit the code examples and remove some informative text.

A diff-marked version of this document is also available for comparison purposes.

This W3C Working Draft has been developed by the Multimodal Interaction Working Group of the W3C Multimodal Interaction Activity .

This document was published by the Multimodal Interaction Working Group as a Working Draft. If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to www-multimodal@w3.org ( subscribe , archives ). All comments are welcomed and should have a subject starting with the prefix '[dis]'.

Publication as a First Public Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy . W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy .

Sections in this document that are not marked as Normative are Informative.

This document is governed by the 14 October 2005 1 September 2015 W3C Process Document .

1. Introduction

To the best of our knowledge, there is no standardized way to build a web Application that can dynamically combine combine, and control discovered components by querying a registry build based on the modality states. This document covers three needs on Discovery & Registration for this kind of web Application implemented following the Multimodal Architecture Specification .

First First, we propose to define a new component responsible for the management of the state of the a Multimodal System, System , extending the control layer already defined in the Multimodal Architecture Specification . This component will be responsible for handling the messages exchanged in order to declare the presence (or absence) of the Modality Components of the system.

Second, this document presents an adaptive push/pull mechanism, needed to inform the system about the changes in the state of the Modality Components. Components . These changes are not necessarily related to the interaction context itself, but they can affect it, for example, in the case of the unavailability of a given Modality Component. Component .

And finally, to allow the advertisement of the state of the Modality Components by using the adaptive mechanism, two new events are needed. The semantics of these new events is not directly related to the interaction context; for this reason a new component responsible of for the management of the state of the Multimodal System is needed.

2. Domain Vocabulary

Interaction Context

For the purposes of this document an Interaction Context represents a single exchange between a system and one or multiple users across one or multiple interaction modes. The Interaction Context It covers the longest period of communication over which it would make sense for components to keep the information available. It can be as simple as a single period of audio visual audiovisual content (e.g. a program ), program), a phone call or a web session. But it

 

The Interaction Context can be also a richer interaction combining combining, for example, voice, gesture and a direct interaction with a light pointer or a shared whiteboard with an associated VoIP call that during the interaction evolves to a text chat. In these cases, a single context persists across various modality configurations. [ See: [See: the multimodal context in the MMI architecture.] architecture]

Multimodal System

For the purposes of this document, a Multimodal System is any system communicating with the user through different modalities such as voice, gesture, or handwriting in the same interaction cycle identified by an a unique context . In a Multimodal System the Application or the end user can dynamically switch modalities in the same context of information exchange. This is a bi-directional system with combined inputs and outputs in multiple sensorial modes (e.g. visual, acoustic, haptic, olfactive, gustative) and modalities (e.g. voice, gesture, handwriting, biometrics capture, temperature sensing, etc). sensing).

Modality Component

For the purpose of this document, a modality 'modality' is a term that covers the way an idea could be communicated or the manner an action could be performed through a medium. In some mobile multimodal systems, for example, the primary modality is a speech and an additional modality can be typically be gesture, gaze, sketch, or any a combination thereof. These are forms of representing information in a known and recognizable logical structure.

 

For example, visual data can be expressed as a gesture modality (e.g. a pointing gesture) or as a signing modality (e.g. a deaf human talking). Following this idea, in this document a Modality Component is a logical entity that handles the input or output of different hardware Devices (e.g. camera, microphone, graphic tablet, keyboard) or software Services (e.g. motion detection, image recognition) associated with the Multimodal System . Modality Components are responsible for specific tasks, including handling inputs and outputs in various ways, such as speech, writing, video, etc. Modality Components are also loosely coupled software modules that may be either co-resident on a device or distributed across a network.

Interaction Manager

For the purposes of this document, the Interaction Manager is also a logical component handling the multimodal integration and composition . It is responsible for all message exchanges between the components of the Multimodal System and the hosting runtime framework [ See [See : Architecture Components , the Description of an Interaction Manager in the Multimodal Interaction Framework ].

Data Component

For the purposes of this document a Data Component is a logical entity that stores the public and private data of any module in a Multimodal System . The data component's primary role is to save the public data that may be required by one or several Modality Components or by other modules (eg, (eg., a session component in the hosting framework ). [ See: framework). [See: the Multimodal Interaction Framework Description of an a Session Component ]. Component].

Application

For the purposes of this document, the term Application refers to a collection of events, components and resources which use server-side or client-side processing and the Multimodal Architecture Specification to provide sensorial, sensory, cognitive and emotional information [ See [See : Emotion Use Cases ] through a rich multimodal user experience. For example, a multimodal Application can be implemented for use in an integrated way, mobile Devices and cell phones, home appliances, Internet of Things Things, objects, robots, television and home networks, enterprise applications, web applications, "smart" cars or medical devices.

Service

For the purposes of this document, a Service is a set of functionalities associated with a process or system that performs a task and is wrapped in a Modality Component abstraction. A multimodal Service is any functionality wrapped in a Multimodal Component (e.g. a Modality Component or the Interaction Manager ) , ), publishing information about its behavior and using one or multiple devices. For the purposes of this document, we We will use the term Service Description as a set of attributes (metadata) describing a particular service. The term Service Advertisement refers to the publication of the metadata about the Service by indexing this metadata in some registry and making available the Service to the client's requests.

Push notifications

In this document we assume that push techniques allow the server to send new events or data to the client through progressive download or long-polling HTTP request from the client. They enable client applications to subscribe to particular events, notifications or data streams and provide the server a callback address or a client-side service to which they are delivered. In consequence, to implement a push technique, the server must know the client's address in order to deliver the data, and some registry of registered subscribers must be created. The server determines when things change, and simply sends down the new data. In this way, new HTTP connections don't have to be opened all the time. The downside is that the single connection between server and client, consumes a resource on the server side while it's open and the more push connections there are, the more it increases network traffic.

3. Scope

In the current state of the Multimodal Architecture Specification , the events that are responsible for handling the control of the user-system interaction, like Prepare or Start , must be triggered only by the Interaction Manager and sent to the Modality Components. In As a result, a Modality Component can not send a StartRequest or a PrepareRequest to the Interaction Manager. In both cases the Modality Component depends on the Interaction Manager to begin the interaction cycle by raising an event, originated by an internal command or in reaction to a previous notification sent by a Modality Component (Figure 1).

A Modality Component may send a NewContextRequest to the Interaction Manager to request the creation of a new context of interaction. The interaction can be started by different Modality Components independently independently. Nevertheless, to start an interaction the Modality component Component needs to be already part of the system a to be registered, given that a context represents a single extended interaction with one or more Modality Components.The Components. The semantics of the NewContextRequest event is different and mostly oriented to the interaction phase, while the registering process is part of a previous phase, when even the presence of the user is not mandatory. This phase is designed for a system that will be designed to handle one or more interaction processes at the same time.

Figure 1: Current MMI communication mechanism: IM to MC ( input and output direction )

In addition, in the current state of the MMI Recommendation , the Interaction Manager is supposed to know ahead of time time, the address and port of all the Modality Components available in the system. In consequence, the preparation of the media or the start of the interaction cycle also currently implies the setting up of a "multimodal session" that is not completely defined at the current stage of the specification .

On the other hand, the Extension and Status notifications are dedicated to the exchange of interaction data, while the data to exchange in a discovery process is mostly previous to any interaction between the user and the system. For example, at load-time, when the system prepares and registers the information about the Modality Components (availability, technical characteristics, cost). In this way, all this information might be used in the future, when the user-system interaction actually begins.

In other terms, the semantics of the two existing notifications differs differ from the features needed for discovery. The communication protocol paradigm (the flow of messages always initiated by the Interaction Manager) is not sufficient if the Recommendation is used to address use cases evolving in dynamic environments, as described in uses cases like [ UC 2.1 ] [UC 2.1] Personal Externalized Interfaces: Smart Cars , [ UC 3.1 ] [UC 3.1] Public Spaces: Interactive Spaces or [ UC 3.2 ] [UC 3.2] Public Spaces:In-Office Events Assistance , MMI Use Cases , or some of the use cases described in our current charter.

In all these cases, the Modality Components enter and quit the multimodal system dynamically, and they must declare to the system, their existence, availability and capabilities to the system in some way. way:

In the first case, [ UC 2.1 ] [UC 2.1] Personal Externalized Interfaces: Smart Cars , the Modality Components provided by a smartphone must be detected by the multimodal system to relate these features with to the features provided by the Modality Components in the car.

In the second case, [ UC 3.1 ] [UC 3.1] Public Spaces: Interactive Spaces , the discovery of the Modality Components installed on the client's smartphone can affect the behavior of the multimodal application in the public space.

In the third case, [ UC 3.2 ] Public Spaces:In-Office Spaces: In-Office Events Assistance , the announcement and discovery of the Modality Component capabilities in a smart conference room can allow the attendees to access to some of the multimodal services provided by the conference room, providing a fine-grained adaptation of the application features to the multimodal interaction's environment state.

For all these reasons the current document addresses the need of support for discovery and registration in very dynamical environments, like the ones described above by proposing a resources manager, a new flow of messages and two events specifically designed to carry discovery and registration data.

4. A manager to handle the state of the resources of the multimodal system

A Modality Components's Component's discovery protocol needs a mechanism tracing the relevant session data to be handled on the control layer. This is the first of the responsibilities for a Resources Manager. This manager is responsible for handling the evolution of the "multimodal session" [ See: [See: Functions of Session Component in W3C Multimodal Interaction Framework ] and the modifications in any of the participants of the system that could affect its global state. This component is also aware of the system’s system's capabilities, like the address of modalities, their availability or their processing state.

The inclusion of the Resources Manager responds to the functional requirement concerning the management of the interaction cycles locally and globally, the requirement of an appropriate real-time sensing for dynamic uses; and and, partially, to the requirement concerning the support of processing of dynamic and incomplete data. [ See: [See: MMI Framework requirements ]

The Resources Manager is nested in the control layer of the multimodal system ( turquoise (turquoise in Figure 2 ) 2) which is slightly different from the proposal of a Session Component described in the W3C Multimodal Interaction Framework .

Figure 2: The Multimodal System's state handling: a Resources Manager

4.1 The Resources Manager and the MVC design pattern of the MMI Architecture

In the MVC model (Figure 3) , 3), the Controller translates the user’s user's actions into method calls on the Model. The Model broadcasts a notification to the View and to the Controller to inform that its state has changed. The View queries the Model to determine the exact change. Upon reception of the response, the View updates the display according to the information received. Thus, in the MVC pattern, the View is directly linked with its controller controller, but it can also query and communicate with the Model.

In this pattern, the Model offers a registration mechanism so that multiple Views and Controllers can express their interest in the Model through anonymous callbacks. This allows an easy implementation of multiple renderings of the same domain concepts either on one local device or across multiple distributed devices.

Figure 3: The MVC architecture design pattern

The Resources Manager proposed in this document the current document, allows the management of the states of the Modality Component (which represent represents the MVC view in the MMI Architecture the MVC view) Architecture) putting this function in the control layer. layer (dark gray in Figure 4).

In this way, the The Resources Manager translates the user’s user's actions into method calls on the Data Component, like as the MVC pattern proposes. But also, the Modality Component's communication and request of state information is restricted to exchanges with the Control layer as the MMI Recommendation defines.

The Model broadcasts a notification to the Resources Manager (Figure 4), and then, the Resources Manager informs the Modality Component that the state has changed using a flow of messages through an UpdateNotification or a CheckUpdateResponse. Upon reception of the UpdateNotification or the checkUpdateResponse, the Modality Component updates the user interface according to the information received.

Figure 4: The Resources Manager included on the MMI structure

4.2 The Resources Manager responsibilities

Thus, the Resources Manager delivers information about the state and the resources of the multimodal system during and outside the interaction cycle . Some of its responsibilities can be:

• To provide a list of the available Modality Components Components.
• To adapt the frequency of requests according to the overall state of the system.
• To parallelize requests according to the availability and description of the system's components.
• To process, provide and store information about the past, present and the estimated state of the Modality Components Components.
• To provide and store information about the addresses of the Modality Components.
• To process, store and provide information about the capabilities of the available Modality Components.

4.3 Data structures handled by the Resources Manager

The Resources Manager can also process and serialize in data structures the traces of external and internal phenomena. Depending on the complexity of the implementation, it the application can store through in the Data Component:

• The image of the current state , represented by the current situation and its state metadata.
  
  For example, to setup a context of interaction the application needs to check the resources currently available. In this case, the Resources Manager can be implemented as a directory of resources, providing and processing check-in and check-out data, using structures stored in the Data Component. This implementation of the Resources Manager is oriented to information about the current state of the multimodal system.

• The history of the states , represented by a set of data structures and its metadata. The type and values of these structures is implementation-dependent.
  
  For example, to adapt the context of interaction to the collection of user preferences and component's states. In this case, the Resources Manager can be implemented as an statistical directory of resources, enhanced with some basic inference techniques. The information can be provided with a numerical score describing the degree of confidence and preference of a particular type of modality. This score can be calculated by the Resources Manager based on the history of the states of a given Modality Component and its use. The availability list provided is then sorted according to the history of the stored states and their confidence factor. This implementation of the Resources Manager is oriented to information about the state of the multimodal system from a statistical point of view. In this case the Resources Manager is a support not only for the present state handling but also for an evaluation of the quality Quality of service(QoS) Service(QoS) provided by each Modality Component.

• The expected states , represented by the extrapolation of the current situation in the future.
  
  For example, to adapt the context of interaction to the expected states of the system. As more sophisticated applications might use past and future, the Resources Manager can be implemented as a support for predictive adaptation of the interaction. For example, a multimodal system can use expected states according to well known environmental information, like a critical peaks of use in emergency cases. In the case of a smart car in an emergency situation, the predictive adaptation of the interaction can infer the resources that are more adapted to the situation in accordance with present and past data. The automatic combination of Modality Components for a given emergency will depend on the environment of the multimodal system and the correct evaluation of the current and past states of the system (i.e. don't use a Modality Component that is not adapted or reliable for a peak use). In this case the Resources Manager is a support for the prediction of future states to reduce the cognitive load of the user interaction according to the prediction and prevision of external factors.

4.4 Requirements Addressed

5. A bidirectional flow of messages

According to the current MMI life-cycle events protocol, the command of Modality Components is initiated by the Interaction Manager, which means that if there is an HTTP client-server implementation, it must be designed following a push notification technique.

In the communication protocol designed for the MMI life-cycle events , the direction of the message flow (mostly from the Interaction Manager to the Modality Components) is suggested by the specification through the description of the control events, even if the specific communication mechanism is not currently described in detail in the normative section and it is, for the moment, implementation dependent.

Our proposal aims to cover a the flow of messages in both directions, which are needed for the Discovery & Registration of Modality Components. With this proposal, the MMI architecture will respond more accurately to architectural requirements like completeness, extensibility, integrability integratability and interoperability concerning the relations allowed between requesters and providers of messages.

Our intention is to allow multimodal developers the use of a communication flow initiated by Modality Components arriving dynamically to the system. An extension that authorizes the Modality Component client to request or provide new data from the server; using for example, form submissions or AJAX-based technologies with the XMLHttpRequest object.

With this mechanism the change in the state of the multimodal session (i.e. the dynamic inclusion of new distributed modalities) is instigated from the Modality Component itself.

After a certain period, the Modality Component's client requests the Resources Manager (i.e. in a server), which notifies the Modality Component about changes on the user interface displayed with other distant components or in the data related to the overall state of the system, causing eventually the Modality Component‘s state to evolve, for example, by putting it on stand-by. The connection is closed after each transfer and the Modality Component is told when to open a new connection, and what data to fetch when it does so.

The inclusion of this new direction in the flow of messages is the best option for tightly coupled clients to which the Resources Manager has reliable access.

Figure 5: Discovery of MC components : pull request to announce (and confirm) availability and capabilities

Nevertheless, adding a new direction in the message flow can raise issues related to the risk of high network traffic reducing the overall performance.

In a distributed multimodal system, Modality Components can be idle for long time if no interaction happens or the situation is not optimal to allow a specific type of interaction. Given that the data rate is very low during this period, it is not necessary to keep the client requesting all the time.

For fine-tuning the Modality Component's requests we propose a new attribute: the timeout attribute. The sleep value of this attribute can reduce the requesting time by putting the client (e.g. a Modality Component using recognition services) into a periodic sleep state. This allows handling the requesting frequency to update the state data in the Modality Component.

5.1 Requirements Addressed

6. Two events for system updates

With these mechanisms of communication a Modality Component can register its services for a specific period of time. This is the basis for the handling of the Modality Component's state. Every Modality Component can have a life-time, that begins at discovery and ends at a date provided at registration. If the Modality Component does not re-register the service before its lifetime expires, the Modality Component's index is purged. This depends on the parameters given by the Application logic, the distribution of the Modality Components or the context of interaction.

When the lifetime has no end, the Modality Component is part of the multimodal system indefinitely. In contrast, in more dynamic environments, a limited life-time can be associated with the Modality Component, and if it is not renewed before expiration, the Modality Component will be assumed to no longer be part of the multimodal system. Thus, by the use of this kind of registering, the multimodal system can implement a procedure to confirm its global state and update the «inventory» <<inventory>> of the components that could eventually participate in the interaction cycle. Therefore, registering involves some Modality Components' timeout information, which can be always exchanged between components and, in the case of a dynamic environment, can be updated from time to time.

For this reason, a registration renewal mechanism is needed. We propose a renewal mechanism based on the use of the timeout attribute and two new events: the checkUpdate Event and the UpdateNotification, used in conjunction with an automatic process that ensures periodical requests.

• to verify if there are any changes in the system side, side
• to recover the eventual message (under the form of a MMI event )
• to adapt the request timeout if needed, needed
• and to trigger automatic notifications about the state of the Modality Component, if the automaticUpdate field in the response is true. true

On the other hand, the UpdateNotification is proposed:, . proposed:

• to periodically inform the Resource Manager about the state of the Modality Component
• to help in the decision making process used by the state handler (in the server side, for example). example)
  

6.1 The timeout attribute for state handling and registration renewal

We propose a dedicated data structure for registration: the timeout attribute. A timeout is an ordered list of three elements:

Definition 1: The timeout tuple

Each Modality Component can sleep for some time, and then wake up and check to see if there are changes planned on the systems side (by requesting the component responsible for the management of the system states). During sleeping, the client turns off checkUpdate requests, and sets a timer to awake itself later.

The sleep value is calculated by the Resources Manager (on the server side, for example) based on the context-awareness level of the multimodal system. It can be static and defined with a set of basic rules or more dynamic, linked to the semantic analysis of the environment.

The second element of the timeout tuple is the communication life-time. A Modality Component leaves the multimodal system when its life-time is exceeded and needs to restart its registering mechanism to obtain a new Modality Component ID and timeout pace. This supports periodic updates of the metadata about availability of the Modality Component and verifying its validity (e.g. authorization). authorization) or the renewal of its metadata (See Figure 6).

Figure 6: Example of Using the timeout use tuple to manage availability

The third element is the communication interval, which is modulated according to the multimodal system's needs by a set of static rules or by a prediction mechanism used in the state handler Component. This element informs the Modality Component before-hand about the frequency of requests that can be allowed by the recipient component (a State Resources Manager in a server, for example) in the current conditions. This value is exchanged on each request, which means that it can be changed at any moment in the multimodal session.

With our proposal, the pull interval communication intervals will equal the publish interval be synchronized, because the Modality Component knows the exact publish interval beforehand according to a time pattern. In this way, data coherence is ensured and network performance maintained. Since the Resources Manager has access to all the state data, it can for example, use a prediction algorithm implemented in the Data Component, to foresee a time when the data is going to change. The Resources Manager then attaches this time value in the timeout triplet to the outgoing data. data allowing the data synchronization.

Finally, if the Resources Manager prediction is wrong and still a change occurs in data, if the Resources Manager knows the address of the Modality Component it can push the change to it, using the original push technique proposed here. In this case the push command is handled as an interruption of the default pull update mechanism. In this way, the system maintains its reliability.

6.2 CheckUpdateRequest and CheckUpdateResponse

This section is Normative.

The CheckUpdate events are the request/response pair, CheckUpdateRequest and CheckUpdateResponse. CheckUpdateRequest and CheckUpdateResponse are used to check to see if there are any changes in the system. They share the Context , Source , Target , RequestID and Data fields with MMI Life Cycle Events. A CheckUpdate event MUST include Source, Target, Target and RequestID. It MAY include a Data field. It MAY also include a Context field, if the event pertains to a specific context.

In addition, both CheckUpdate events MUST include the additional fields UpdateType, State, and Timeout. The CheckUpdateResponse MUST also include the field "AutomaticUpdate". The CheckUpdate events can be sent from either the Modality Component to the Resources Manager or from the Resources Manager to the Modality Components.

6.2.1 UpdateType

An attribute that MUST indicate the type of check to be performed. Some values can be: Handshake, Monitoring, Reporting, DataCheck, Resuming, Leaving.

6.2.2 State

An attribute that MUST indicate the state of the requesting component and its value. Some values can be: Alive, Loading, Registering, Available, Idle, Busy Waiting, Processing, Unavailable, Unregistered. (See Figure 8) 7)

Figure 8: 7: Discovery and Regisration Registration states for a Modality Component

6.2.2.1 ALIVE

A Modality Component MUST be in Alive state when it is already started and ready to be identified and registered on the multimodal system.

6.2.2.2 LOADING

A Modality Component MAY be in Loading state if it is currently loading resources that it will need to function.

6.2.2.3 REGISTERING

A Modality Component MAY be in Registering state when it has already requested a registration id in the multimodal system through the Resources Manager.

6.2.2.4 AVAILABLE

A Modality Component MUST be in Available state when it is already registered, ready to function and not busy.

6.2.2.5 IDLE

A Modality Component MAY be in Idle state when it is already registered, functioning and waiting for a user input.

6.2.2.6 BUSY WAITING

A Modality Component MAY be in Busy Waiting state when it is already registered, functioning and waiting for a system's event or a system's response.

6.2.2.7 PROCESSING

A Modality Component MUST be in Processing state when it is already registered and processing some task. The process could be any multimodal or unimodal task like transferring, searching, recognizing or any other kind of process.

6.2.2.8 UNREGISTERED

A Modality Component MUST be in Unregistered state if the system's rules command the unregistration and the Modality Component is no longer authorized to interact with the system (for example if it has to update its access credentials).

6.2.2.9 UNAVAILABLE

A Modality Component MUST be in Unavailable state when it has a failure, or when it is unregistered and it does not update its registration, or when it lacks of resources or must reload them. In short, whent when the Modality Component is no more able to correctly ensure its task.

The following list shows the flow between these states:

The component MUST pass from the ALIVE state to Loading, Registering or Available state.

The component MUST pass from the LOADING state to Registering or Available state.

The component MUST pass from the REGISTERING state only to Available state.

The component MUST pass from the AVAILABLE state to Idle, Busy Waiting or Unavailable state.

The component MUST pass from the IDLE state to Busy Waiting, Processing or Unavailable state.

The component MUST pass from the BUSY WAITING state to Processing, Idle, Unregistered or Unavailable state.

The component MUST pass from the PROCESSING state to Processing, Idle or Unavailable state.

The component MUST pass from the UNREGISTERED state only to Unavailable state.

- Unauthorized Component

- Failure of a Registered Component

- Unavailability of a Registered Component

- Registration of a Component needing multimodal resources

6.2.3 AutomaticUpdate

A boolean-valued attribute indicating whether the state of the Modality Component will be automatically updated by UpdateNotification events or whether the Modality Component will keep sending UpdateNotification events in the future without waiting for another CheckUpdateRequest event.

6.2.4 Metadata

An element with an attribute to link with external complementary metadata and an info attribute for inline data.

6.2.5 Timeout

An element used to temporize the exchanges between components. This element MUST include three attributes. It MUST include a sleep attribute to define the "communication sleep period", a validity attribute to represent the "communication validity period" in milliseconds and an interval attribute to express the "communication interval" in milliseconds. Example:

<mmi:Timeout sleep="1000" validity="5000" interval="500"/>

6.2.6 Example

CheckUpdateRequest (from MC to RM)

<mmi:mmi xmlns:mmi="http://www.w3.org/2008/04/mmi-arch" version="1.0">
    <mmi:CheckUpdateRequest 
        mmi:Source="URIForMC"
        mmi:Target="URIForRM" 
        mmi:RequestID="request-1"
        mmi:State="LOADING"
        mmi:UpdateType="HANDSHAKE"
        mmi:AutomaticUpdate="true"> 
       <mmi:metadata src="URIForMetadata" info="{medium:{acoustic}, modality:{acoustic:SPEECH}}" />
       <mmi:Timeout sleep="0" validity="500" interval="500"/>
    </mmi:CheckUpdateRequest>
</mmi:mmi>

CheckUpdateResponse (from RM to MC)

<mmi:mmi xmlns:mmi="http://www.w3.org/2008/04/mmi-arch" version="1.0">
    <mmi:CheckUpdateRequest 

    <mmi:CheckUpdateResponse 

        mmi:Source="URIForRM"
        mmi:Target="URIForMC" 
        mmi:RequestID="request-1"
        mmi:State="REGISTERED"
        mmi:UpdateType="HANDSHAKE"
        mmi:AutomaticUpdate="true"
        mmi:data="MCRegistrationID Data">
       <mmi:Timeout sleep="1000" validity="360000" interval="500"/>
    </mmi:CheckUpdateRequest>

    </mmi:CheckUpdateResponse>

</mmi:mmi>
 

6.3 UpdateNotification

This section is Normative.

The UpdateNotification event informs other system components (periodically or not) about the changes on the state of a Component. If automatic updates are enabled, the Component may send multiple UpdateNotification messages after a single CheckUpdateRequest message. It shares the Context , Source , Target , RequestID and Data fields with MMI Life Cycle Events. An UpdateNotification event MUST include Source, Target, and RequestID. It MAY include a Data field. It MAY also include a Context field, if the notification pertains to a specific context.

In addition, an UpdateNotification MUST include the additional fields UpdateType, State, and Timeout. The UpdateNotification event can be sent from either the Modality Component to the Resources Manager or from the Resources Manager to the Modality Components.

6.3.1 UpdateType

An attribute that MUST indicate the type of check to be performed. Some values can be: Reporting , in the case of an important change to the Modality Component that needs to be reported to the Resources Manager, like a noise situation in some audio capture, for example. An update notification can also be triggered when the Modality Component uses or produces new data: in this case the UpdateType can be DataUpdate . Finally a Modality Component can need to inform other components about some user interface changes, for example when the load of some data is finished and this affects the user interface display. In this case the UpdateType will be InterfaceUpdate

6.3.2 State

An attribute that MUST indicate the state of the requesting component and its value. These values correspond to the values supported by the CheckUpdate event: Alive, Loading, Registering, Available, Idle, Busy Waiting, Processing, Unavailable, Unregistered.

6.2.3 Timeout

An element used to indicate the pace of the notification process when automatic updates are enabled. This element MUST include three attributes. It MUST include a sleep attribute to define the "communication sleep period", a validity attribute to represent the "communication validity period" in milliseconds and an interval attribute to express the "communication interval" in milliseconds.

6.3.4 Example

UpdateNotification (from MC to RM)

<mmi:mmi xmlns:mmi="http://www.w3.org/2008/04/mmi-arch" version="1.0">
    <mmi:UpdateNotification 
        mmi:Source="URIForMC"
        mmi:Target="URIForRM" 
        mmi:RequestID="request-1"
        mmi:UpdateType="REPORTING"
        mmi:State="BUSY WAITING">
        <mmi:Timeout sleep="1000" validity="360000" interval="200"/>
    </mmi:UpdateNotification>
</mmi:mmi>

6.4 Requirements Addressed

7. Open Issues

Security techniques are separated from the current communication protocol in the architecture as in this document: we assume that this is a private network. Security issues for this protocol in public networks will be addressed later.

Also, this document is focusing on the flow of messages and the building blocks needed to support this flow. The details of the communication between the Interaction Manager and the State Manager, as the interfaces between the Data Component and the State Manager will be described later.

Another open issue is the management of multiple instances of the Interaction Manager and the flow of messages between them, the Resources Manager and multiple Modality Components.

Finally, a common vocabulary for the description of the Modality Component's attributes in order to Register and Compose them, is an important subject to be treated in order to allow a better interoperability between multimodal systems. Vocabulary and Capabilities will be addressed in a subsequent document.

8. Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions by all the members of the Multimodal Interaction Working Group, in particular, Kazuyuki Ashimura, the W3C Team Contact for the Working Group.

Finally, the authors would also like to acknowledge the people outside of the MMI Working Group who help with the process of developing this document, specially Jean-Claude Moissinac and Isabelle Demeure.

A. References

A.1 Key References

[MMI-ARCH]

Jim Barnett (Ed). Multimodal Architecture and Interfaces. 25 October 2012 W3C Recommendation. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/. http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/

[MMI-REQ]

Stéphane H. Maes and Vijay Saraswat (Eds). Multimodal Interaction Requirements 8 January 2003. W3C Working Group Note. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-reqs/

[DIS-USE]

B. Helena Rodríguez (Ed). Registration & Discovery of Multimodal Modality Components in Multimodal Systems: Use Cases and Requirements 15 July 2012. W3C Working Group Note. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-discovery/

A.2 Other References

[WEB-INTENTS]

Paul Kinlan. Web Intents. Web Intents . Available at URL: http://webintents.org

[FOLEY-1984]

Foley,J.D., Wallace,V.L. and Chan, P. “The The Human Factors of computer Graphics interaction techniques” techniques In: IEEE computer Graphics and Applications, 1984. Vol. 4. No.11, pp. 13-48. Available at URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org

[FOSTER-2002]

Foster,I et al. The Open Grid Services Architecture . Available at URL: http://www.ogf.org

[BURBECK-1987]

Steve Burbeck Applications Programming in Smalltalk-80(TM): How to use Model-View-Controller (MVC) . Available at URL: Applications Programming in Smalltalk-80(TM) http://www.dgp.toronto.edu

[BOZDAG-2007]

Engin Bozdag, Ali Mesbah and Arie van Deursen, 2007 A Comparison of Push and Pull Techniques for AJAX. Report TUD-SERG-2007-016a. TU Delf, 2007 AJAX In: 2007 9th IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution (WSE), 2007. pp. 15-22. Available at URL: http://dx.doi.org/