Conventional layout review
Assertion
[Title, role, or organization] asserts that:
- We have reviewed layout conventions for similar products or processes.
- The layout used follows a conventional pattern or a tested non-conventional pattern was used.
Information that needs to be included publicly:
- title, role, or organization making the assertion (if different from the conformance claim)
- date of assertion (if different from the date of the conformance claim)
Recommended internal documentation (Informative):
- report covering review of layouts for similar products or processes
- design log capturing decision to use specific layouts
- if a non-conventional layout is used, usability testing results that demonstrate the utility of the approach taken
Tests
This content needs to be written.