DRAFT Smart Cities Interest Group Charter
The mission of the Smart Cities Interest Group is
- to identify and document use cases and requirements that W3C specifications need to meet to support Smart City services,
- to obtain feedback from all stakeholders on the usage of Web technologies for Smart Cities,
- to gather expert input on important features for Smart Cities based on the Web technology, and
- to provide a forum for technical and business discussions related to Smart Cities.
This proposed charter is available on GitHub. Feel free to raise issues.
Start date | [dd monthname 2020] (date of the "Call for Participation", when the charter is approved) |
---|---|
End date | [dd monthname 2022] (two year duration) |
Charter extension | See Change History. |
Chairs | Goal: 2-3 co-chairs |
Team Contacts | Kazuyuki Ashimura (0.2 FTE) |
Meeting Schedule |
Teleconferences: Regular weekly calls will be held.
Face-to-face: we will meet during the W3C's annual Technical Plenary week; additional face-to-face meetings may be scheduled by consent of the participants, usually no more than 3 per year. Workshop: A workshop with an open CFP and invited speakers may be organized to provide further feedback and input and the guide the group's agenda. |
"Smart Cities" refers to a range of technologies and processes for intelligent management of our built and inhabited environment. As interest rises, we see prospects for smarter and easier integration of various technologies from multiple vendors related to IoT devices and Web services.
Several preliminary use cases on Smart Cities have been discussed within the Web of Thing (WoT) IG as part of the WoT standardization based on the proposal during the Second WoT Workshop in Munich. However, Smart Cities include various technologies, of which WoT is just one. So W3C organized a virtual online workshop on Smart Cities in June 2021 to finalize this Charter for the Smart Cities Interest Group to collect input from the Smart Citeis stakeholders.
During the workshop discussion, we did the following:
- Identified Smart Cities standardization stakeholders to drive the development of Web standards aligned with the real needs of Smart Cities
- Clarified reasonable applications for Smart Cities technologies
- Saw how to improve the draft Charter for the potential Smart Cities Interest Group for further discussions within that IG
We also confirmed that it would be very important to consider inclusive design including accessibility, privacy, security, and internationalization. Smart City applications are tightly related to the people who live in cities. We want Smart City technology to have a positive impact on their lives and want to avoid unintended negative consequences.
The goal of the group is not to generate standard itself, but to gather pain points, requirements and priorities for Web-based smart cities in the near future. So we need to figure out the focus that W3C can make the most impact. We don't want to duplicate work already done by the other SDOs.
Scope
Note: This charter was drawn up as an outcome of the June 2021 W3C Workshop on Smart Cities.
Scope Summary
- Identification of stakeholders from the industries, countries/cities and communities to involve in the group's discussion
- Survey on the existing technologies and standards for Smart Cities (Technology Landscape)
- Best Practices on what technologies, e.g., WoT, Automotive, Geospatial, VR/AR, Speech and Semantic Web, to be applied for what kind of Smart Cities applications, e.g., improved accessibility, visitor guidance and energy management.
- Use cases and requirements for Smart Cities
Standards are essential for Smart City technology and business development. Standards benefit vendors, cities, and users. For vendors, standards unify markets and mean that a larger market can be addressed with a single product design, allowing products to more efficiently make returns on the investments needed to develop them. For cities, standards allow the deployment of technologies that can be sourced from multiple vendors, more and higher quality products, and increases the probability that systems will remain usable over a longer timescale. Standards also encourage the development of open systems that can interoperate with other standardized systems, multiplying the number of use cases that can be addressed. For users, standardized technologies mean that services available in one city will also be available in others, facilitating mobility.
However, we need to know what standards should be developed to achieve these objectives. What gaps exist? What opportunities can be exposed by standards that enable new use cases? What are the business drivers that encourage adoption of standards, and how can standard development be aligned with these drivers? Given a set of standards that could be developed, what are the priorities? How can the needs and goals of all stakeholders be aligned?
The purpose of this Interest Group is collect and connect Smart City stakeholders to answer these kinds of questions and drive the development of Web technology standards aligned with the real needs of Smart Cities.
The topics that the Interest Group will address include but are not limited to:
- Transportation, both public and private;
- Logistics, including last-mile delivery of goods and services;
- Infrastructure, including IoT-based sensing and actuation;
- Energy management and sustainability;
- Connection between crimate crisis and smart cities;
- Relationship with Smart Buildings as part of the geolocation things like location of pipes;
- Signage, addressing the problem of timely delivery of information to a diverse population;
- Open data portals, including network APIs to data services and the development of app ecosystems;
- Data management, facilitating the rapid ingestion, storage, and dissemination of data
- Edge and cloud computing, allowing computation to be efficiently applied when and where needed;
- Payments, to allow services to be monetized, encouraging new business development and cost recovery;
- Privacy, to preserve the rights of citizens and other stakeholders;
- Security, to preserve the integrity and safety of systems and protect users;
- Accessibility, to incorporate design-for-all thinking throughout all aspects of smart city infrastructure, and ensure accessibility for people with disabilities in every activity and at every stage of life;
- Internationalization, to support diverse populations and tourism.
We can speculate about many topics, so need to identfy what the group's key topics are and see what would fit with W3C through the discussion with the existing smart cities.
The main tasks that the Interest Group will undertake include:
- Identification of stakeholders from the industries, countries/cities and communities to involve in the group's discussion
- Survey on the existing technologies and standards for Smart Cities (Technology Landscape)
- Best Practices on what technologies, e.g., WoT, Automotive, Geospatial, VR/AR, Speech and Semantic Web, to be applied for what kind of Smart Cities applications, e.g., improved accessibility, visitor guidance and energy management.
- Smart Cities use cases to which Web technologies are applicable and requirements to provide better support for high priority use cases
The group should also consider the following when work on the above tasks:
- Identification and prioritization of gaps in Web standards for Smart City use cases;
- Incubation of technical solutions for the identified requirements by supporting the creation of Community Groups or Business Groups focusing on particular topics;
- Suggesting existing Working Groups to include particular topics in their scope as appropriate;
- Suggesting the creation of new Working Groups to address particular topics if no existing Working Group is appropriate;
- Tracking and review of Smart City-related deliverables developed by other W3C groups, and reporting of issues as appropriate;
- Coordination with other organizations to gather knowledge, coordinate input into W3C efforts, and promote development and use of W3C standards within Smart City applications;
- Ensuring issues of accessibility, device independence, internationalization, performance, privacy, and security are given equal consideration in all discussions and outcomes.
Accessibility is very important for smart cities because cities include many people potentially with disabilities. So we need to look for "missing data" within smart cities, i.e., data of those who might not be well-represented among the data-sets, to ensure that they are surely recognized and well-served by the smart cities. For that purpose, we need to consider people with multiple disabilities (intersectional considerations) and people with cognitive and learning disabilities too.
Note that there are many topics to discuss around Smart Cities and the scope of the group may become too broad, so we would like to focus on data governance and privacy management for the first year based on the discussion during the workshop.
Out of Scope
The technical development of standards is not in scope for the Interest Group. Technical discussions are expected to take place within a new or existing W3C Working Groups, or within a Community Group or Business Group when incubation is needed.
Deliverables
The primary deliverables of the Smart Cities Interest Group will be IG Notes that identify requirements for existing and/or new technical specifications and gaps in the Web Platform.
Normative Specifications
The Interest Group will not deliver any normative specifications.
Other Deliverables
Other non-normative documents may be created such as:
- Survey on the existing technologies and standards for Smart Cities (Technology Landscape)
- Best Practices on what technologies, e.g., WoT, Automotive, Geospatial, VR/AR, Speech and Semantic Web, to be applied for what kind of Smart Cities applications, e.g., improved accessibility, visitor guidance and energy management.
- Use cases and requirements for Smart Cities
Timeline
Put here a timeline view of all deliverables.
- Month YYYY: First teleconference
- Month YYYY: First face-to-face meeting
- Month YYYY: Requirements and Use Cases for FooML
- Month YYYY: FPWD for FooML
- Month YYYY: Requirements and Use Cases for BarML
- Month YYYY: FPWD FooML Primer
Success Criteria
Smart Cities vary widely and diversely. So we can wander into all sorts of areas if we don't get the right regulators to hear where they care. Terefore we need to make sure the group enrolls the support of implementers, the authorities and cities to get them involved to help set prioritization.
For that purpose, we need to identify important stakeholders and would start with a smaller team, e.g., Asian stakeholders like Singapore, Japan, China and Korea, and involve more countries/cities like Sweden, Brazil and NYC via the collaboration with the W3C Chapters and the attendees of the Smart Cities Workshop in June 2021 and the TPAC breakout sessions in October 2021 (Day 1, Day 2).
The Interest Group will have succeeded if it can achieve the following:
- Identification of stakeholders from the industries, countries/cities and communities to involve in the group's discussion
- Survey on the existing technologies and standards for Smart Cities (Technology Landscape)
- Best Practices on what technologies, e.g., WoT, Automotive, Geospatial, VR/AR, Speech and Semantic Web, to be applied for what kind of Smart Cities applications, e.g., improved accessibility, visitor guidance and energy management.
- Use cases and requirements for Smart Cities
Coordination
For all deliverables, this Interest Group will seek horizontal review for accessibility, internationalization, performance, privacy, and security with the relevant Working and Interest Groups, and with the TAG. The Interest Group is encouraged to engage collaboratively with the horizontal review groups throughout development of each deliverable.
W3C Groups
Additional technical coordination with the following W3C Groups will be made, per the W3C Process Document:
- Primary:
- Web of Things (WoT) IG/WG/CG
- internet of things, discovery, edge computing)
- Media and Entertainment IG
- signage, video links
- Web and Networks IG
- edge computing, network metadata
- Publishing BG / Publishing CG / EPUB 3 WG / Publishing WG
- documentation, public communications, multimedia
- Automotive WG
- v2v comms, geolocation
- Spatial Data on the Web IG
- geolocation
- Decentralized Identifiers (DID)WG / Verifiable Credentials (VC) WG / Credentials CG
- identifiers, signing, credentials, authentications
- Dataset Exchange WG
- (geolocation, semantics, data modelling)
- Immersive Web WG
- VR, AR
- GPU for the Web WG
- ML, DL, edge computing
- Big Data CG
- data management, data modelling
- Voice Interaction CG
- Voice agents for smart user interface
- Solid CG
- Mechanisms to share private data in a controlled way
- Agriculture CG
- definition of agriculture use cases
- Linked Building Data CG
- Relationship with smart buildings as part of the geolocation use cacses
- Secondary:
- Web Authentication WG
- security, credentials
- Service Workers WG
- edge computing
- Devices and Sensors (DAS) WG
- geolocation
- JSON-LD WG / JSON for Linking Data CG
- data modelling, semantics
- Web Payments WG/Web Payment Security IG
- payments
- Web Real-Time Communications WG
- video and data streams
- Web Assembly WG
- edge computing
- Accessible Infographics CG
- data visualization
External Organizations
- SDOs working on Smart Cities:
- IETF:
- Coordination on communication protocols, data modelling, discovery, and security standards.
- ITU-T:
- Coordination on standards for telecommunication technologies and the use cases they enable.
- Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC):
- Coordinated standards for geolocation and geographic information systems.
- ISO
- tbd
- IEC
- tbd
- ISO/IEC JTC1
- tbd
- BSI
- tbd
- ETSI
- tbd
- ECLASS
- tbd
- Countries, Cities, Economic Unions and Communities (not limited to but incluiding the following):
- ASEAN:
- Discussion of smart city use cases and deployments in South-East Asia.
- The World Economic Forum
- tbd
- The Smart City Consortium
- tbd
- The Smart Cities Council
- tbd
- TM Forum
- tbd
- Viable Citeis
- tbd
- Other countries, cities and communities to be added including developing countries and rural areas
Participation
To be successful, this Interest Group is expected to have 6 or more active participants for its duration. The chairs and editors are expected to contribute half of a working day per week towards the Interest Group. There is no minimum requirement for other Participants.
The group encourages questions, comments and issues on its public mailing lists and document repositories, as described in Communication.
The group also welcomes non-Members to contribute technical submissions for consideration upon their agreement to the terms of the W3C Patent Policy.
Participants in the group are required (by the W3C Process) to follow the W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.
Communication
Technical discussions for this Interest Group are conducted in public: the meeting minutes from teleconference and face-to-face meetings will be archived for public review, and technical discussions and issue tracking will be conducted in a manner that can be both read and written to by the general public. Working Drafts and Editor's Drafts of deliverables will be developed on a public repository and may permit direct public contribution requests. The meetings themselves are not open to public participation, however.
Information about the group (including details about deliverables, issues, actions, status, participants, and meetings) will be available from the Smart Cities Interest Group home page.
Most Smart City Interest Group teleconferences will focus on discussion of particular deliverables, and will be conducted on an as-needed basis.
This group primarily conducts its technical work on GitHub issues. The public is invited to review, discuss and contribute to this work.
The group may use a Member-confidential mailing list for administrative purposes and, at the discretion of the Chairs and members of the group, for member-only discussions in special cases when a participant requests such a discussion.
Decision Policy
This group will seek to make decisions through consensus and due process, per the W3C Process Document (section 3.3). Typically, an editor or other participant makes an initial proposal, which is then refined in discussion with members of the group and other reviewers, and consensus emerges with little formal voting being required.
However, if a decision is necessary for timely progress and consensus is not achieved after careful consideration of the range of views presented, the Chairs may call for a group vote and record a decision along with any objections.
To afford asynchronous decisions and organizational deliberation, any resolution (including publication decisions) taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference will be considered provisional. A call for consensus (CfC) will be issued for all resolutions (for example, via email, GitHub issue or Web-based survey), with a response period from one week to 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue. If no objections are raised by the end of the response period, the resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Interest Group.
All decisions made by the group should be considered resolved unless and until new information becomes available or unless reopened at the discretion of the Chairs or the Director.
This charter is written in accordance with the W3C Process Document (Section 3.4, Votes) and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process Document requires.
Patent Disclosures
The Interest Group provides an opportunity to share perspectives on the topic addressed by this charter. W3C reminds Interest Group participants of their obligation to comply with patent disclosure obligations as set out in Section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. While the Interest Group does not produce Recommendation-track documents, when Interest Group participants review Recommendation-track specifications from Working Groups, the patent disclosure obligations do apply. For more information about disclosure obligations for this group, please see the W3C Patent Policy Implementation.
Licensing
This Interest Group will use the W3C Document license for all its deliverables.
About this Charter
This charter has been created according to section 5.2 of the Process Document. In the event of a conflict between this document or the provisions of any charter and the W3C Process, the W3C Process shall take precedence.
Charter History
Note:Display this table and update it when appropriate. Requirements for charter extension history are documented in the Charter Guidebook (section 4).
The following table lists details of all changes from the initial charter, per the W3C Process Document (section 5.2.3):
Charter Period | Start Date | End Date | Changes |
---|---|---|---|
Initial Charter | [dd monthname yyyy] | [dd monthname yyyy] | none |
Charter Extension | [dd monthname yyyy] | [dd monthname yyyy] | none |
Rechartered | [dd monthname yyyy] | [dd monthname yyyy] |
[description of change to charter, with link to new deliverable item in charter] Note: use the class |